Transferability, Finality, and Debt Settlement
نویسندگان
چکیده
The process of payment is fundamental to exchange in a decentralized economy. In production economies, payments often take the form of transfers of inside money, i.e., specialized forms of debt. Associated with each type of inside money is a set of rules that governs both the legitimacy of such transfers as means of extinguishing other debts, and the allocation of the ensuing risks. In this paper the authors develop a model of debt as inside money. They focus on an historically important form of payment: “negotiable instruments” such as the bill of exchange. In a simple mechanism design framework the authors show the advantages of transferable debt over simple chains of credit. The model is then extended to encompass other aspects of negotiability, including “endorsement” and the rights of a “holder in due course.” JEL classification: E400, G200, K200
منابع مشابه
The Moral Obligations of Some Debts
If given the opportunity to reduce your debt, albeit at some financial risk, would you take it? Interviews and observations in two debt settlement firms show that debt settlement clients tend not to calculate financial risks in deciding which debts to try to settle. Rather, they treat their relationship with their creditor as a reciprocal and ongoing one. If the service provided by their credit...
متن کاملA Model for settlement of health insurance organizations’ debt to health service delivery institutions
Background: Sukuk is a type of financial instrument backed by balance sheet and physical assets. This applied and descriptive study aimed at providing solutions to the problems faced by insurance companies in the health sector. Methods: In this study, we achieved operational models by reviewing the release nature and mechanism of any of the securities and combin...
متن کاملA dynamic model of unsecured credit
We study the terms of credit in a competitive market in which sellers (lenders) are willing to repeatedly nance the purchases of buyers (borrowers) by engaging in a credit relationship. The key frictions are: (i) the lender is unable to observe the borrowers ability to repay a loan; (ii) the borrower cannot commit to any long-term contract; (iii) it is costly for the lender to contact a borro...
متن کاملRecovery Before Redemption: A Theory of Delays in Sovereign Debt Renegotiations
Negotiations to restructure sovereign debts are protracted, taking on average almost 8 years to complete. In this paper we construct a new database (the most extensive of its kind covering ninety recent sovereign defaults) and use it to document that these negotiations are also ineffective in both repaying creditors and reducing the debt burden countries face. Specifically, we find that credito...
متن کاملDerivative markets for debt market development Background paper for IFC’s Developing domestic debt markets – A manual for policy makers
2 The choices for policy makers of markets and products 4 2.1 Trading venue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 Clearing and settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2.1 Netting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2.2 Counterparty credit risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2....
متن کامل